Everyone wants safer AI. But who will rein it in?
Sept 16 (Reuters) - Even for someone who has spent the past decade covering this fast-moving industry, the past week felt extraordinary: researchers warning about human extinction, followed by AI lab CEOs urging a coordinated slowdown; capped by a president calling all the alarmism a hoax.
With the AI safety debate simmering, Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff turned this year's Dreamforce into a livestreamed stage for a more consequential argument: Who decides how fast frontier AI is allowed to move? Within hours of one another, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman took the stage in San Francisco and offered three different answers.
Amodei laid out the three-step plan from his essay: improve own safety practices, agree on shared standards, and eventually underpin international regulation. Then came Jensen Huang with almost the opposite prescription: "We don't need any new laws." Hours later, Altman landed somewhere in between, saying companies should be willing "to slow down or stop" if they cannot proceed safely.
Washington appears unwilling to play a role here. The Trump administration's current framework explicitly opposes creating a new federal AI rulemaking agency. Recent AI-agent incidents also expose a more alarming observation: What if the developers themselves do not fully understand what their systems are capable of?
The discovery of rogue AI activity was first uncovered by the victim, Hugging Face, and not the perpetrator, OpenAI.